viernes, 6 de abril de 2012

Thnking about evidence #12


           The most compelling evidence in my argument is that all youngsters that are 18 or older should vote and be more enrolled in politics because those decisions affect their lives in one way or another. This evidence is real strong because if youngsters are enrolled in choosing a president, they can ask the candidates to help them more with their education or personal difficulties. By reading these ideas youngsters may realize that is for their own to participate in candidate elections to fight for their own ideals. Since this is one of my strongest points I will think about this claim when creating my thesis to refer back to it throughout the essay.

            My weakest point by making this argument that youngsters of 18 of age or older should vote in order to get what they want from government. The counterargument from them is that teens or young people are not relevant to government and they may say that their vote doesn’t make a difference toward the election. My explanation to this argument would be that youngsters need to be more enrolled in politics in order to have more opportunities and also to be addressed by the candidates. I will talk about why is so important for them to vote, even though their single vote will not count for much the community of teens as a whole does count and will make a difference because they are going to be the future of the country. They will make the change and therefore they should be enrolled in politics since they are 18 and being able to vote.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario